Super cute "no smoking" posters set to nauseate entire city

cutenosmokeAt first, I thought I was looking at a sale flyer for Pavillions.

Not being a smoker, I usually find second-hand smoke annoying in outdoor dining areas at restaurants, on beaches and at other public spaces. But do I need a cutesy ad campaign with precious graphics and copy to announce that smoking is a big fat no-no?

How about a simple, official-looking “No smoking allowed under penalty of law” sign instead of this silly poster campaign that the city of Santa Monica is spending $150,000 to execute? (There are four other versions.)

Instead of stating forthrightly that smoking in an area is illegal, why make it seem like it’s an option if you’re really not in the mood for yucky asparagus?

In 2007, Santa Monica banned smoking in most popular public spaces, like the Third Street Promenade, Santa Monica Pier and Pacific Park. The ban also applies to outdoor common areas such as bus stops, ATM lines, local beaches and 20 feet from the entrances of any public building.

In 2008, the law was extended to include restaurants’ outdoor dining and waiting areas.

In today’s NY Times, Adam Radinsky, Santa Monica’s deputy city attorney, says he thinks the cuteness  factor is “playful, a fun type of campaign, not too much the government telling you what to do, not too Big Brother-ish.”

I like to think I’m as liberal as the next Whole Foods shopper, but is a touchy-feely, Sesame Street approach to enforcing laws supposed to inspire confidence in government?

Related posts:

  1. LA City Council Mulls More Smoking Restrictions
  2. Isn’t Smoking in Restaurants Against the Law?
  3. Will smoking be cool again?
  4. Santa Monica City Council Member and Former Mayor Herb Katz Dead
  5. Century City Traffic Snarling; Culprit: Suspicious Package


4 Comments so far

  1. Lucinda Michele (la_michele) on June 22nd, 2009 @ 5:38 pm

    It’s some unholy marriage between a Ralph’s commercial and one of those "The Truth" anti-smoking ads. Feh.


  2. frazgo on June 23rd, 2009 @ 10:17 am

    Seems like a lot of money and arty posters when a simple no smoking sign on the patios or wherever outdoor dining occurs would suffice. Funny how the Peoples Republic of SaMo spend their money.


  3. libertad on June 23rd, 2009 @ 12:27 pm

    Better than no sign and if they’re going to put up a sign I appreciate that they made it visual. I say amen to ANYTHING that alerts smokers to cut the butt!

    Actually, I would think they went this route because my experience is that smokers do NOT respond well to admonitions to not smoke – ether from a human or a sign.


  4. crunchyfrog on June 24th, 2009 @ 8:42 pm

    it doesn’t work very well visually.
    the asparagus could be considered the one that doesn’t belong because of it’s green color and it’s vertical arrangement. the other three have similar coloration and diagonal orientation within the bundles.

    just sayin’



Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.