The most expensive parking lot in Los Angeles, perhaps the USA

2 hours of parking = $648 at the Sunset 5. And it isn't even valet.

2 hours of parking = $648 at the Sunset 5. And it isn

If you go to see a movie at the Sunset 5 theatre, you’ll find that they validate parking, free, for up to three hours, which is typically sufficient. However, if you’re planning to see parts 1 and 2 of Stephen Soderbergh’s 4+  hours “Che,” the box office urges you to repark your car during the intermission.

While I was doing just that, along with dozens of other attendees Saturday night, another movie patron ahead of me stuck his ticket into one of those self pay machines – I presume to double check they’d validated his ticket – and was confronted with a fee that could make Che return from the grave to start another revolution: $648.

I think he was expecting sympathy after he told me that he’d only been there for a little over 2 hours… instead I joyfully snapped some low grade cel phone cam shots and told him how awesome this would be for the blog. Unfortunately, I don’t have proper closure to this tale, nor explanations as to the exorbiant fee. Hacker? Software glitch? Inflation? We may never know.

They take change!

They take change!

Related posts:

  1. Hollywood Parking Fines = Outrageous
  2. More parking palimpsests
  3. Annoyed at increase of Los Angeles visitors parking permit price
  4. Parking in LA: A riddle wrapped in a mystery inside an enigma
  5. Pseudo-celebrity parking tard


7 Comments so far

  1. dilip on January 11th, 2009 @ 1:43 am

    Thank goodness i live in india. We park in the middle of the fckin road :P


  2. Burns! (burns) on January 11th, 2009 @ 2:30 am

    "They take change." Hahaha.

    So, how was "Che?" I’ve been wanting to see it, but that’s a pretty solid time commitment.


  3. silencio on January 11th, 2009 @ 3:01 am

    i say software bug. those automated parking machines in that structure are batshit crazy (haha, anyone want some chaching?), so i wouldn’t be surprised if the software were problematic.


  4. WILL CAMPBELL (willcampbell) on January 11th, 2009 @ 7:12 am

    I think they were advance-calculating the cost of repairing any barricade he might bust through after refusing to pay.


  5. Matt Mason (mason) on January 11th, 2009 @ 11:26 am

    Maybe the machine income-tested him via fingerprint and decided that’s what he could afford, like the cops in Finland who gave the equivalent of a $100,000 speeding ticket to a guy, based on his hefty income.


  6. Mechazawa (stellastellastella) on January 11th, 2009 @ 10:58 pm

    double insane for this and finnish speeding ticket


  7. metroman on January 12th, 2009 @ 12:30 am

    Seems to me that Che would approve.



Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2009 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.