California Supreme Court overturns gay marriage ban

Does this mean we’ll be seeing gay marriages right here in L.A.?

I honestly was starting to think I wasn’t going to see this in my lifetime… of course, the case will likely be appealed to the U.S. Supreme Court. Then again, the Supremes have been avoiding this subject for a while… so what does this mean?

021-Gay Marriage Rallies March-May ‘04

In a 4-3 ruling, the justices rule that state marriage laws are unconstitutional.

SAN FRANCISCO — – The California Supreme Court ruled today that same-sex couples should be permitted to marry, rejecting state marriage laws as discriminatory.

The state high court’s 4-3 ruling was unlikely to end the debate over gay matrimony in California. A group has circulated petitions for a November ballot initiative that would amend the state Constitution to block same-sex marriage, while the Legislature has twice passed bills to authorize gay marriage. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger vetoed both. [full story]

Coverage at CNN

Photo taken at the Massachusetts Statehouse in May 2004 by Violentz

Related posts:

  1. BREAKING: SUPREME COURT UPHOLDS PROP. 8
  2. Prop 8 Oral Arguments to be heard in Supreme Court 3/5/09
  3. Court tells Lutheran school it’s okay to expel lesbian students
  4. Cheney supports gay marriage
  5. Churches ban straight marriage, divorce lawyers threaten legal action

Print this post


8 Comments so far

  1. Mark and Steve (markandsteve) on May 15th, 2008 @ 11:26 am

    Oh my! Maybe George can finally marry Brad!


  2. frazgo on May 15th, 2008 @ 12:18 pm

    nice post joz joz joz, saw it a while ago and just didn’t have the time to do anything with it.


  3. lezgull on May 15th, 2008 @ 12:22 pm

    my oh my.what is a lesbian seagull to do? :)i suppose wait for it to be over-ruled :(


  4. robb on May 15th, 2008 @ 12:46 pm

    There’s no basis to appeal to the US Supreme Court, as the court’s decision was based on the state constitution and there’s nothing in federal law that would overrule it. Otherwise, Massachusetts’s gay marriages would have been tackled by SCOTUS already.


  5. gpro on May 15th, 2008 @ 12:51 pm

    But I dont want to marry my boyfriend….


  6. eclipse292 on May 15th, 2008 @ 1:59 pm

    If anyone wants to celebrate, we’ll be rallying with wedding cake (!) at 7 p.m. this evening, at the corner of Santa Monica Blvd. and San Vicente in West Hollywood.

    Hope to see you there!!!

    w00t!!!


  7. Mike Winder (ghidorah76) on May 15th, 2008 @ 4:44 pm

    @Mark and Steve: I predict that will be the most-covered wedding in LA Metblogs history!


  8. RumorsDaily (doorframe) on May 15th, 2008 @ 5:12 pm

    I was going to say that this won’t be appealed the Supreme Court, but someone’s already said it for me. Only things that involve federal law, or the federal Constitution, go to the Supreme Court. Anything based on state law or state constitutions stay in the state court systems (more or less).



Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.