Comments on: Billboard battle: L.A. Weekly 1, Clearchannel & City 0

By: Alternative media wins big against City of L.A., big media « California Faultline

Thu, 03 Apr 2008 21:24:21 +0000

[...] [h/t Mack Reed at LA Metblogs] [...]

By: lucindamichele

lucindamichele — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 06:21:14 +0000

I feel so dirty right now.

By: EL CHAVO!

EL CHAVO! — Thu, 03 Apr 2008 05:22:01 +0000

I hope this leads to many billboards coming down!

By: Mack Reed

Mack Reed — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:34:56 +0000

Count on results. Pelisek’s definitely a digger and a pro.

By: ruth666

ruth666 — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 20:16:09 +0000

Gee, let me guess – MONEY is involved?

I can’t wait to see how many illegal billboards we have, and who owns them.

Best of all I can’t wait to NEVER hear how much revenue was generated and/or that no punishment or fines will be levied for the infringements.

Unless the Weekly (or someone else) stays on top of this I guarantee we’ll never hear another word on the subject. Too much money at stake, all of it ill-gotten.

By: Jason Burns

Jason Burns — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:52:47 +0000

There will be blood.

By: David Markland

David Markland — Wed, 02 Apr 2008 19:38:10 +0000

Congrats to the LA Weekly, although their ire should be more towards the City of L.A.

How the hell would anyone in the city consider permits for billboards to be proprietary info? Heads better roll.