What’s with the lotuses?

844526-Travel_Picture-Echo_Park_Lake_Downtown_LA_with_Lotus.jpg
[couldn't get a photo while driving so I borrowed this awesome one from RockInsider.com]

The 30th Lotus Festival is a mere two weeks away, yet I drove by Echo Park Lake today and the lotuses are occupying about 25% of their usual space.

A few are blooming - maybe a dozen - but that’s nothing compared to the usual population of that entire end of the lake.

Anybody know what gives?

More info on Lotus Festival:

Friday, July 13, 2007 - 5:00 p.m. to 9:00 p.m.
(Fireworks at 9:00 p.m.)
Saturday, July 14, 2007 - 12:00 noon to 9:00 p.m.
(Fireworks at 9:00 p.m.)
Sunday, July 15, 2007 - 12:00 noon to 8:00 p.m.
(Dates coincide with the anticipated blooming of the Lotus Flower but plenty are already blooming)

Related posts:

  1. Lotus Festival this weekend
  2. Lotus Festival - NOW!
  3. Fireworks Season
  4. Good Night!
  5. CD13 Can Bring It!

7 Comments so far

  1. Mike (unregistered) on June 30th, 2007 @ 7:52 pm

    Same thing happened last year too. There were *maybe* three or four flowers, and that was it, during the festival. Looks like the same thing may be happening again this year.

  2. Ben (unregistered) on June 30th, 2007 @ 9:38 pm

    Probably the lack of any rain whatsoever this year.

    Or maybe the lake is getting polluted.

  3. David Markland, non sports fan (unregistered) on June 30th, 2007 @ 10:18 pm

    Phew - at first glance I thought this post was titled, “Whats with the locusts?”

  4. Will Campbell (unregistered) on July 1st, 2007 @ 11:51 am

    On the contrary Mike; while the lotuses were late in blooming last year, the lagoon was chock full of ‘em. This year’s crop is a drastic reduction.

    And Ben’s gotta be kidding about the lack of rain, right? The things live in a water supply whose level remains constant be it drought or deluge. The water’s quality might be a factor but not the level of precipitation.

  5. Mike (unregistered) on July 2nd, 2007 @ 12:44 am

    you’re right, Will — I misunderstood and thought Ruth666 was referring to the late bloom. I haven’t been by Echo Park lately to see if there are simply fewer lotuses (loti?) all together…

  6. mr rollers (unregistered) on July 2nd, 2007 @ 9:47 am

    Last year’s late bloom was supposedly caused by a cooler than usual spring. This year’s condition is entirely different (as noted above): far less overall vegetation than normal.

    My suspicions run to something in the water or a problem with the harvest of dead vegetation after last season.

  7. ruth666 (unregistered) on July 2nd, 2007 @ 1:46 pm

    The blooming’s right on schedule - no different than any other year - but reduction in the number of plants is drastic.


Terms of use | Privacy Policy | Content: Creative Commons | Site and Design © 2008 | Metroblogging ® and Metblogs ® are registered trademarks of Bode Media, Inc.