<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: In Vernon, Your Vote Counts</title>
	<atom:link href="http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 02:51:39 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.6</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Kenarch</title>
		<link>http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/#comment-21255</link>
		<dc:creator>Kenarch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Oct 2006 08:54:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/#comment-21255</guid>
		<description>Oh... the Chicago LA Times??? Welllll... I&#039;ve been trying real hard to not see the paper that way, but things like this really make me wonder. When Times Mirror sold to ChiTribune I knew it was going to be a problem. Methinks this is just the beg-inning. Soon enough there will be an effort spearheaded by one or more of our LA mover-shaker types to wrest &quot;our&quot; paper back. Hopefully by then the LAT will still be a viable business entity.

As for Vernon... yes, we have a few gerrymandered, unnaturally low population cities around here, set up precisely to maximize tax revenue and limit political adventurism (yeah, right). Vernon may be the most notorious, but Industry, Commerce (ever wonder why they are named thus...), Santa Fe Springs and Irwindale largely follow suit. Vernon has been a feifdom for generations, and yes, the LAT has done a good job of covering this latest bout of nastiness - back when it was the LOS ANGELES Times.

Oh, and yeah, Vernon offers the best surface street alternative out of Downtown heading southeast. You know what I&#039;m talking about. Now don&#039;t go clogging up my shortcut!
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Oh&#8230; the Chicago LA Times??? Welllll&#8230; I&#8217;ve been trying real hard to not see the paper that way, but things like this really make me wonder. When Times Mirror sold to ChiTribune I knew it was going to be a problem. Methinks this is just the beg-inning. Soon enough there will be an effort spearheaded by one or more of our LA mover-shaker types to wrest &#8220;our&#8221; paper back. Hopefully by then the LAT will still be a viable business entity.</p>
<p>As for Vernon&#8230; yes, we have a few gerrymandered, unnaturally low population cities around here, set up precisely to maximize tax revenue and limit political adventurism (yeah, right). Vernon may be the most notorious, but Industry, Commerce (ever wonder why they are named thus&#8230;), Santa Fe Springs and Irwindale largely follow suit. Vernon has been a feifdom for generations, and yes, the LAT has done a good job of covering this latest bout of nastiness &#8211; back when it was the LOS ANGELES Times.</p>
<p>Oh, and yeah, Vernon offers the best surface street alternative out of Downtown heading southeast. You know what I&#8217;m talking about. Now don&#8217;t go clogging up my shortcut!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: eecue</title>
		<link>http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/#comment-21254</link>
		<dc:creator>eecue</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:18:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/#comment-21254</guid>
		<description>Yes I am sure that someday they will get to it and cover it, like they covered the other Vernon stuff, but my point was, why is the AP wire scooping them on it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes I am sure that someday they will get to it and cover it, like they covered the other Vernon stuff, but my point was, why is the AP wire scooping them on it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sam</title>
		<link>http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/#comment-21253</link>
		<dc:creator>sam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 17 Oct 2006 17:12:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://la.metblogs.com/2006/10/16/in-vernon-your-vote-counts/#comment-21253</guid>
		<description>the mess in vernon was covered in LA Times several times in the last couple months. im sure they will get to it.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>the mess in vernon was covered in LA Times several times in the last couple months. im sure they will get to it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
